- From: Marc VanHeyningen <marcvh@spry.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 15:15:29 -0700
- To: miked@eolas.com (Mike Doyle)
- Cc: burchard@cs.princeton.edu, www-talk@w3.org
> As for the comment concerning the Z39.50 standards committee meeting, our > claims relate specifically to embedded interactive program objects in World > Wide Web documents, not just downloading executable code for general > document rendering. Say, can somebody produce prior art for the use of the Chinese Remainder Theorem in World Wide Web documents? If not, does that mean I can patent it? (Does the patent specifically say "world wide web documents"? In precise and legal terms, what is a "world wide web document" anyway? More importantly, what isn't? Why is a document returned via Z39.50 not a World Wide Web document?)
Received on Monday, 21 August 1995 18:17:53 UTC