st 15. 3. 2023 v 4:32 odesílatel Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> napsal: > It is in scope for TAG, the W3C and whatever. But the idea your version is > the one. If you want to keep the W3C relatively independent, that doesn't > work. If Microsoft and Apple have to drop their version of scripts, so > should you. > It's still about bringing the web to its full potential. Solid is a pretty good effort in that direction IMHO What does it do? - Adds a social element (started with FOAF) - Adds authentication - Adds persistent storage, towards a read write web - Adds human and machine readable data - Adds realtime updates - Friendly to humans and agents What are the limitations: - Still a bit buggy - Some UX issues - Largely (but not soley) based on turtle, which is a small part of the web - Not 100% backwards compatible e.g. requires conneg and few on the web do that - Steep learning curve for new developers - Lacks plain old JSON interop (personal observation) Not the only way of doing things, but definitely something interesting / creative / innovative. It also lends itself well to interoperability, together with future and past innovations. > > On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 at 15:18, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org> wrote: > >> Solid is a growing protocol/movement, and the tech parts of it — the >> Solid Project — are basically a W3C Community group. >> >> Solid adds things which the web needed but hadn’t yet standardized, >> including global single sign-in, standard access control, and a fast API >> for data read-write between an app and a store (a Solid Pod). By making >> the API to the store universal, it means you don’t have to change the store >> when you make a new app, which completely changes the architecture and >> markets and business models which are possible. It also leaves individuals >> empowered rather than exploited. >> >> Would it be reasonable for the TAG to review the architecture at a high >> level, or review the protocol? It would be useful to get a knowledge of >> the Solid stack in neighboring parts of the technology. >> >> (A separate future question are the client-client interop specs which are >> needed for interop between apps, such as contacts, chat, etc.) >> >> See https://solidproject.org/. https://solidproject.org/TR is where the >> specs end up after their github-based proces. >> >> Best wishes >> >> Tim BL >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > ---- > > https://hyperdata.it <http://hyperdata.it/danja> > >
Received on Monday, 20 March 2023 17:44:25 UTC