Re: Reviewing the Solid protocol

It is in scope for TAG, the W3C and whatever. But the idea your version is
the one. If you want to keep the W3C relatively independent, that doesn't
work. If Microsoft and Apple have to drop their version of scripts, so
should you.

On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 at 15:18, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org> wrote:

> Solid is a growing protocol/movement, and the tech parts of it — the Solid
> Project — are basically a W3C Community group.
>
> Solid adds things which the web needed but hadn’t yet standardized,
> including global single sign-in, standard access control, and a fast API
> for data read-write between an app and a store (a Solid Pod).  By making
> the API to the store universal, it means you don’t have to change the store
> when you make a new app, which completely changes the architecture and
> markets and business models which are possible. It also leaves individuals
> empowered rather than exploited.
>
> Would it be reasonable for the TAG to review the architecture at a high
> level, or review the protocol?  It would be useful to get a knowledge of
> the Solid stack in neighboring parts of the technology.
>
> (A separate future question are the client-client interop specs which are
> needed for interop between apps, such as contacts, chat, etc.)
>
> See https://solidproject.org/. https://solidproject.org/TR is where the
> specs end up after their github-based proces.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Tim BL
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
----

https://hyperdata.it <http://hyperdata.it/danja>