On Thursday several members of the AB (dsinger, Florian, cwilso, fantasai, and Jeff) joined the TAG F2F to present the Director-free Process proposal. These are the resolutions of the TAG on this topic, for consideration by the Process CG and AB (slightly reworded from the whiteboard for clarity). Topic: TAG Appointment Committee RESOLVED: Team participant should be a "non-voting" Staff Contact role, but can break ties in votes if the committee takes any votes. RESOLVED: If committee can't make an appointment in time, Team will appoint, but for Team appointments the term is only 1 year. RESOLVED: TAG Appointment Committee should be larger. Prefer 11 members consisting of 10 "voting" members + 1 staff contact, following IETF(?) precedent. Given a division of members into Chairs and TAG members, suggest 3 TAG members and 7 chairs. RESOLVED: Randomly select from pool, then check whether willing to volunteer (rather than asking for volunteers first, then randomly selecting from reduced pool). Rationale: likely to yield broader membership -> Please find a way to represent the Web developer community. -> Restrict membership to not more than 1 member per company. -> Make lists of candidates from which members are selected public. Topic: W3C Objection Decision Council RESOLVED: Council should pick its own chair, per issue, by consensus, falling back to a vote if that fails. (Goal is to choose a neutral chair for the topic.) RESOLVED: Chair must be a member of the Council RESOLVED: If FO not resolved in X days, chair MUST report status to AC. Report MAY be public. Suggest 90 < X < 180. RESOLVED: TAG supports that full Council must issue the conclusion, even if smaller ad-hoc task forces are formed to do work. RESOLVED: No separately elected council. W3C Council as AB+TAG is good. RESOLVED: Council participation cannot require F2F participation. RESOLVED: Membership of Council for a particular issue should be fixed at formation, not changed by elections. Recusal/withdrawals allowed, but if membership drops below some minimum threshold, council for that issue should be reformed. -> Discussed whether council's majority / minority opinions MAY, MUST, or MUST NOT be signed. No conclusions yet. -> Discussed whether percentage of support for position should be reported, but no conclusions yet. (Somewhat dependent on previous point.) ~fantasaiReceived on Friday, 13 September 2019 15:48:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:57:17 UTC