- From: Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 15:47:32 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Noah Mendelsohn composed on 2016-08-05 12:23 (UTC-0400): > See [1]. > I thought this might be of some interest to the TAG. Seems to me that this > is OK insofar as the addin is a modification to a user agent, and is > presumably activated only with the user's consent. > Nonethess, this seems to embody a slightly skewed view of Web protocols: if > I as a URI authority serve a new or updated page, your browser will do what > I intend and show the user that new content. If I delete a page, the Though you are within your rights to do so, nevertheless, you shouldn't cause URIs to disappear: https://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.html Those who *need* to be able to make URIs disappear, need to prevent them from being archived in the first place. > browser will not honor that deletion, but will show content anyway. This > seems to me just a bit of a slippery slope. A 404 is just as meaningful in > Web protocols (no such page) as a 200 IMO. > I'm not proposing that the TAG do anything about this or devote significant > time to it right now, just pointing it out in case it's of interest. > Thank you. > Noah > [1] > http://gadgets.ndtv.com/apps/news/firefox-will-try-to-show-you-saved-archive-of-a-page-instead-of-404-error-869482 "No More 404s" that page describes doesn't even show up in addon search results in Firefox ESR 45. There are alternatives, e.g.: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/open-in-wayback-machine/ -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/
Received on Friday, 5 August 2016 19:48:02 UTC