Re: Draft finding - "Transitioning the Web to HTTPS"

On 12 January 2015 at 20:24, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com> wrote:

> >> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:52:43 -0500
> >> From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
> >> Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/54B03F9B.3030702@arcanedomain.com>
> > ...
> >> IMO one of the brilliant things that Tim did in the original design of
> the
> >> Web was to make artful gambles on architectural choices [1] that would
> >>> tend< to have value over time.
> >
> > I strongly agree with you on that. I'm curious what document you meant
> to cite
> > with the [1] there, though. (It seems like you forgot to provide a link.)
> >
> >    --Mike
>
> Yeah, I realized I left out the referent and didn't want to bother the
> list with a resend. I intended to reference Tim's design issues musings, at
> [1].
>
> Anyone working on the Web, and indeed anyone interested in the design of
> large-scale distributed systems should read these IMO. Fascinating to see
> what was anticipated, what wasn't, and how things have worked out given the
> assumptions and gambles made in the early days.
>

+1000

If the "Design Issues" Axioms and Weaving the Web were required reading for
this list, it might save a whole bunch of time, imho.

I'd also point out Brian Carpenter's, "Architectural Principles of the
Internet*"*

ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1958.txt


>
> Noah
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/
>
>
> On 1/12/2015 2:34 AM, Michael[tm] Smith wrote:
>
>> Hi Noah,
>>
>> Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, 2015-01-09 15:52 -0500:
>>
>>  Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:52:43 -0500
>>> From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
>>> Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/54B03F9B.3030702@arcanedomain.com>
>>>
>> ...
>>
>>> IMO one of the brilliant things that Tim did in the original design of
>>> the
>>> Web was to make artful gambles on architectural choices [1] that would
>>>
>>>> tend< to have value over time.
>>>>
>>>
>> I strongly agree with you on that. I'm curious what document you meant to
>> cite
>> with the [1] there, though. (It seems like you forgot to provide a link.)
>>
>>    --Mike
>>
>>
>

Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2015 00:21:00 UTC