Re: discussion about uri scheme, fragments, etc...

Possibly the most notable change is the loosening of rules on registration of provisional (not permanent) URI schemes; it's intentionally a VERY low bar.

Cheers,


> On 10 Apr 2015, at 5:38 pm, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> This is a heads-up about discussions in IETF’s apps-group about draft-jetf-appswg-uri-scheme-reg.
> See <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/FgWB_pukisUKJT2j89Fs_L588YA> and other email in that thread
> for those interested (as we discussed fragments in the past here).
> Of course, it’s best to send feedback on the IETF list.
> HTH,
> 
> -- 
> Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
> 
>        ~~Yves
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Friday, 10 April 2015 07:46:47 UTC