- From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:00:24 -0700
- To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADC=+jc13hvxmJs_72WKtWC5qEVxfjinQ25HPDhgGy3Sem3aNQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:00 PM, ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote: > This is a good idea! Would the TAG appoint the task force? > My guess is they would look for volunteers. > > We have often complained that the TAG does not get security > experts so, although there has been a desire to dig deeper into > security issues, this has not happened. With the task force model > the TAG could appoint a group of people to write a white paper > or finding on some aspect of security. > > Provided, of course, that they could get enough qualified volunteers :-) > > All the best, Ashok > > I was proposing appointment for reasons I tried to describe about the perceived value by an employer or something, but certainly it would make a lot of sense that they would consider anyone who is interested and volunteering. > > On 10/27/2014 4:56 PM, Brian Kardell wrote: > > I mentioned this at the last f2f, and I wanted to reiterate it incase it > gets lost as I've had a number of conversations and I think that a lot of > people think it's a compelling idea... > > The formal TAG being a small group has a lot of advantages, and we want > those to be 'real people' too - and generally speaking - in order to get > elected, you have to be involved in things. This means that the # of > person hours that can be spent are sort of inadequate in many cases to get > the broad focus we want. Similarly, we have rules which, for good or bad > are the rules we have now, and they limit us to one person per org. All of > this means that we're probably not getting "the most" out of it that we > could, so I have a suggestion: > > Adopt a model in TAG where you make use of appointing qualified > individuals to a task force with a limited scope. If the neutrally elected > TAG appointed someone to a task force, this has enough "credibility" that > employers might be willing to pay, it could help stretch resources and work > within existing constraints and get a lot more done. The actual details > could be further determined, but generally speaking a task force could help > the TAG understand things at deeper levels without getting bogged down, > they could make proposals or recommendations, and generally help align > things more efficiently. > > -- > Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com > > > -- Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com
Received on Monday, 27 October 2014 23:00:51 UTC