Re: Comments on the EME opinion

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Domenic Denicola <
domenic@domenicdenicola.com> wrote:
>
>
> Finally there's the aspect that the TAG would prefer any privacy-sensitive
> features (of which EME is one, I believe) to be restricted to secure
> origins. Search for "RESOLUTION: We support..." in
> https://github.com/w3ctag/meetings/blob/gh-pages/2014/sept29-oct1/09-29-f2f-minutes.md
> .
>

​In practice there's no reason for EME in browsers to be any more privacy
sensitive than regular cookies.

...Mark