- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 18:12:48 +0200
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > As a concrete example: as near as I can tell, the following hasn't had wide > review, and therefore I suggest that implementers would want to consider > carefully before they chose to implement it: > > http://intertwingly.net/stories/2014/10/05/urltest-results/4b60e32190 It seems you did not test on Windows. Are you suggesting we make URL parsing dependent on OS? But yes, around file URLs there's a few small things (not this test) that could be done better. The URL Standard has open bugs pointing these out. > I also don't think "all those tests are likely wrong" is a fair conclusion. Fair. Some appear correct. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 9 October 2014 16:13:16 UTC