Re: Draft [URL] reference update to informative text

I refer you to the normative reference policy.  :)  I'm really not trying
to cycle this argument over and over, but this is a major change to a
policy and the W3C's way of working, and it should be treated as such; not
a disagreement about one simple, relatively non-contentious reference.


On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Domenic Denicola <
domenic@domenicdenicola.com> wrote:

>  Yes, and?
>
>
>
> *From:* Chris Wilson [mailto:cwilso@google.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 8, 2014 12:02
> *To:* Domenic Denicola
> *Cc:* Yves Lafon; www-tag@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: Draft [URL] reference update to informative text
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Domenic Denicola <
> domenic@domenicdenicola.com> wrote:
>
> My understanding of the TAG's position based on our discussion at the last
> meeting is we would prefer to just reference https://url.spec.whatwg.org/.
>
>
>
> That's an unstable reference.
>