W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2014

RE: Spec review for quota management, please review

From: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 19:24:22 +0000
To: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <35a106e1779e449986b11aa7d154d827@DM2PR05MB336.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Per the call today we'd like to get any comments from other TAG members in by Monday, after which I'll package it up and send it off to the quota management editors, barring are any objections.

From: Domenic Denicola
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 00:29
To: www-tag@w3.org
Subject: RE: Spec review for quota management, please review

Following up on some great comments from Yehuda, Dave, and Sergey, I revised this spec review. The diff can be seen at


or the new version in total at


The largest change was removing the alternative proposed model Alex and I had talked through, since as they pointed out such work is not part of a spec review but is a separate conversation. Additionally, I tried to start a section on proposed use cases, requirements, and constraints, based on feedback from Dave and Yehuda that help in such areas would be an area where the TAG has the potential to add the most value.

I'd love any further feedback people have to give. At this point I'm fairly confident we can send it to the quota management editors in good conscience, but if others would like to chime in beforehand please let me know.

-----Original Message-----
From: Domenic Denicola
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 01:02
To: 'www-tag@w3.org'
Subject: Spec review for quota management, please review

Alex and I had some discussions about the overall model we envision for storage and quota management on the web, which I was able to write up into a spec review. I also fleshed out my original critiques on JavaScript idiomaticness into longer explanations.

I've submitted this proto-review at https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/pull/25; you can see it rendered at


I'd love inline feedback on the pull request if others want to contribute their ideas, before we merge this into an official spec review to send off to the Quota Management folks.

Received on Thursday, 13 March 2014 19:25:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:57:01 UTC