- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:36:11 +0200
- To: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhLMmV4DdttP0984Qk8Hsv_c=xSmpr8fC-Kai6Pui3_6_A@mail.gmail.com>
On 30 June 2014 16:14, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com> wrote: > > On 30 Jun 2014 14:52, "Melvin Carvalho" <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 30 June 2014 14:50, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> As you may know, Google recently had the good sense and taste to hire > fellow TAG member Dominic Denicola. W3C rules insist that, despite being > individually elected as representatives of the membership, our employment > situation is more important to the membership than our capacity to make > meaningful contributions at the TAG. Therefore one of us must resign. > >> > >> As my term ends soonest, I will be stepping down from my position so > that Dominic can continue the good work of helping to encourage > extensibility in the web platform. I will, however, continue to attend > meetings through the end of my elected term (Jan '15) in protest of what, > frankly, is appallingly poor organizational design. Evidence of this piles > up: last year we also lost productive TAG members to vagaries of employment > interaction with W3C policy. > >> > >> If the AB's goal with this misbegotten policy were to prevent multiple > individuals from a firm from influencing the TAG's decisions, I invite them > to bar me from meetings post my removal. Were it not so, I invite them to > change the policy. > > > > > > As a bystander that is interested in the ongoing work of the TAG It was > unclear to me which policy change you are in favour of > > > > Do you think a w3c member organization should have 2 seats on the TAG > *indefinitely* or *until one term ends* > > I think that the AC and AB need to decide if the TAG -- which writes no > specs and wields no direct power, and which elects individuals and not > organisations -- should be organised around member organisations in the > first place. > Thanks for the clarification > Do you have reason to think the TAG should be organised this way? > Given that the TAG is able to occasionally vote on matters, I could picture a scenario where multiple members from the same w3c member organization, may not be ideal. Just my personal opinion, wish you the best of luck resolving this issue. > > Thanks for your contributions, I follow your work > > > >> > >> > >> Regards > > > > >
Received on Monday, 30 June 2014 14:36:39 UTC