Re: 2NN draft responses

Hi Eric,

Before you go down this road too far, I would very much encourage you to:

a) Submit the drafts ASAP (as they *are* works in progress; waiting until you think they're final and then throwing them over the wall is asking for disappointment)

b) Come and discuss them in the HTTPbis WG. We're meeting in Toronto, and I'm currently putting an agenda together; I could give you some time then. Failing that, we'll likely be meeting again at the Honolulu meeting in November.

Cheers,


On 16 Jun 2014, at 6:25 pm, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote:

> * Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> [2014-06-16 09:41+0200]
>> On 2014-06-16 00:19, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>>> I think the 2NN draft is ready for final review:
> 
> ...before I throw it over the wall to IETF
> 
> 
>>> <http://www.w3.org/2014/02/2xx/draft-prudhommeaux-http-status-2NN.xml>
>>> ...
>> 
>> "Final Review" and doesn't sound right if the text actually hasn't
>> been submitted as internet draft at all...
> 
> Yeah, I meant that, after a few draft cycles on the W3C side, TAG and
> LDP-WG need to look hard at it before I submit it to IETF. Apologies
> for the ambiguity and the very likely abuse of process terms.
> 
> 
>> Best regards, Julian
> 
> -- 
> -ericP
> 
> office: +1.617.599.3509
> mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59
> 
> (eric@w3.org)
> Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
> email address distribution.
> 
> There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
> which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/