- From: Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 07:37:34 -0600
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
Marcos Caceres wrote: > > The relevance of the TAG only extends to the work that the TAG does > with the limited resources it has, and not by affiliation. The TAG > can't force anyone to do anything - but can provide well reasoned and > researched opinions that help shape the underlying platform (or > influence the opinions of those who architecture it). > Well, that's a matter of opinion. IMNSHO, weakening http-range-14 had more to do with affiliation than architecture, weakening credibility of the TAG for the reversal. > > This should be clear now, with the success the "reformed" TAG has had > over the last 2 years. > Sorry Marcos, but while I agree with some of what you've said, this isn't clear to me now (I mostly find myself agreeing with Larry). Again, IMNSH (and not so welcome) O, FWIW. -Eric
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 13:37:55 UTC