W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2014

Re: Forced Resignation

From: Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 07:37:34 -0600
To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Cc: "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20140702073734.ce9f5126b68abcab08981a23@bisonsystems.net>
Marcos Caceres wrote:
> The relevance of the TAG only extends to the work that the TAG does
> with the limited resources it has, and not by affiliation. The TAG
> can't force anyone to do anything - but can provide well reasoned and
> researched opinions that help shape the underlying platform (or
> influence the opinions of those who architecture it).

Well, that's a matter of opinion. IMNSHO, weakening http-range-14 had
more to do with affiliation than architecture, weakening credibility of
the TAG for the reversal.

> This should be clear now, with the success the "reformed" TAG has had
> over the last 2 years.

Sorry Marcos, but while I agree with some of what you've said, this
isn't clear to me now (I mostly find myself agreeing with Larry). Again,
IMNSH (and not so welcome) O, FWIW.

Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 13:37:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:57:03 UTC