- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 16:44:18 +1000
- To: "Eric J. Bowman" <eric@bisonsystems.net>
- Cc: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
Eric, On 2 Jul 2014, at 4:34 pm, Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net> wrote: > Mark Nottingham wrote: >> >> after all, if you trust someone to be a contributor to the Web >> architecture, surely you trust them to know the difference between >> company interests and the Webs'? >> > > Seriously? Really, seriously? If that's what you think, then your > warnings to me about "disruptiveness" on the http-wg list make a lot > more sense. The only e-mail to you that I find in my Sent Mail even remotely along these lines is: <http://www.w3.org/mid/021DF08B-395A-4CCA-9F3F-DA7E8437955B@mnot.net> Were you referring to that, or something else? > But, I must strenuously disagree -- the last thing I trust > is that contributors here will put the interests of the Web ahead of the > interests of those cutting their paychecks. I find that a bit sad, but OK... > Otherwise, architectural > concerns wouldn't be scoffed at as they are. But, as you've made quite > clear to me, bringing up these concerns will get me banned as they're > political, not technical, in nature. But I think that's what HTTP/2 is > all about, so I'd best shut the **** up about it. OK. I'm not sure what's causing the vitriol here, but I apologise if I've contributed to it. I don't believe I ever said you'd be banned for contributing; I'm only try to maintain a professional environment that focuses on data and outcomes, not ad hominems (which dismissing someone's viewpoint because it's "corporate" is). Regards, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 06:44:50 UTC