- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:26:22 +0000
- To: Mark Davis ☕ <mark@macchiato.com>
- Cc: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>, Vint Cerf <vint@google.com>, IDNA update work <idna-update@alvestrand.no>, "PUBLIC-IRI@W3.ORG" <public-iri@w3.org>, "uri@w3.org" <uri@w3.org>, "www-tag.w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Mark Davis ☕ <mark@macchiato.com> wrote: > I put out some strawman ideas on this list, but clearly there needs to be > more discussion. I think everyone recognizes that we won't get to zero > "breaking" IDNA2003 URLs; the goal should be to get to a small enough number > that the major players feel comfortable flipping the switch on the remaining > ones. > > Back on Sept 9. It's been a couple of months. Any updates for us? Thinks I found not addressed by IDNA2003 that http://url.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-host-parser papers over: * Percent-decoding * Rejecting certain ASCII code points to ensure idempotency, but not e.g. "_" as that would break sites * Lowercasing the ASCII code points as IDNA2003 only applies if there's non-ASCII code point I have not checked what of that can be removed if we use UTS #46 instead. Certainly referencing IDNA2008 directly does not work, as "A.com" does not become "a.com", which would presumably break too many scripts. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2014 16:26:51 UTC