W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2014

Re: Draft for note to send to Push API editors/authors

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 14:44:43 +0000
Message-ID: <CADnb78iZ_M3N3t2ju4XvzA-F2iZsuhTP5WBD8TuT5FjOLFuaow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
Cc: Konstantinov Sergey <twirl@yandex-team.ru>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com> wrote:
> This feels fanciful, at best.

I don't think so. The setup described in the specification allows for
exactly that.

> There are existing underlying transports. They are (or can be) specified
> elsewhere. They are also interchangeable under this API. We must not prevent
> this API from accommodating current reality (thereby robbing it of purpose),
> nor can we expect everyone to sign up to a new transport for no reason other
> than that we asked them to.
> Lets get concrete: is it acceptable to the folks clamoring for a specified
> transport if one is specified elsewhere?

That was acknowledged long ago.

Received on Tuesday, 7 January 2014 14:45:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:57:00 UTC