- From: Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net>
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 22:45:13 -0700
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
Mark Nottingham wrote: > > * The example of a village with poor access (e.g., in Africa) has > regularly been brought up in the IETF as an example of a population > who want shared caching, rather than encryption. The (very strong) > response from folks who have actually worked with and surveyed such > people has just as regularly been that many of these people value > security and privacy more. > Until those people realize that what really matters to their business, is reliability -- is three days of downtime with no support from the "security/privacy" providers who are capable of providing scaling in an "HTTPS Everywhere" Web, really an improvement? Or just a false economy based on a false sense of security/privacy? I'd like to see a survey which takes reliability into account, where "security/privacy" leads to downtime in their online presence -- the impact of which is definitely more noticeable in their bottom lines than they ever noticed from not using encryption on every request/ response. -Eric
Received on Tuesday, 9 December 2014 05:45:30 UTC