W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2014

Re: WebIDL v1 vs. v2

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 11:51:40 -0500
Message-ID: <547F3F9C.7000306@intertwingly.net>
To: www-tag@w3.org
On 12/03/2014 11:23 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
> Over on public-webapps there is a discussion about trying to advance
> "WebIDL v1" to REC:
> https://readable-email.org/list/public-webapps/topic/help-with-webidl-v1
>
>  I think it would be disastrous from a web-architecture point of view
> to give the outdated WebIDL v1 draft any sort of legitimacy. The TAG
> should probably weigh in on this.

I made a suggestion that hopefully should help webapps sort this out for 
themselves:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014OctDec/0551.html

- Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2014 16:52:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:57:08 UTC