- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 11:51:40 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
On 12/03/2014 11:23 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: > Over on public-webapps there is a discussion about trying to advance > "WebIDL v1" to REC: > https://readable-email.org/list/public-webapps/topic/help-with-webidl-v1 > > I think it would be disastrous from a web-architecture point of view > to give the outdated WebIDL v1 draft any sort of legitimacy. The TAG > should probably weigh in on this. I made a suggestion that hopefully should help webapps sort this out for themselves: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014OctDec/0551.html - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2014 16:52:12 UTC