On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > In part, yes. `data:application/json,%EF%BB%BF%5B%5D` is an example of a > byte sequence that's accepted by the XMLHttpRequest proposal even though > it's not a proper application/json entity as defined by RFC 4627. I have > written about that and the other differences in detail on the JSON WG's > mailing list; `site:ietf.org inurl:json "Hoehrmann" "XMLHttpRequest"` is > likely to find the relevant messages. They don't allow a BOM? Beautiful. That seems like something that should be rectified in the format, not XMLHttpRequest. All text formats allow a BOM. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Friday, 18 October 2013 13:36:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:59 UTC