W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2013

XHR vs JSON, was: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:19:46 +0200
Message-ID: <52612762.9020209@gmx.de>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "Appelquist Daniel (UK)" <Daniel.Appelquist@telefonica.com>
CC: www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>
On 2013-10-18 14:07, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> ...
> I do not see how a request from the W3C TAG as the one above will
> improve anything for the JSON community. The TAG's resources would be
> better spent trying to unify the many subtly different JSON variants. A
> useful start would be working with W3C's Web Applications Working Group
> so their XMLHttpRequest specification does not define a JSON variant of
> its own, possibly through coordinating with the IETF JSON WG. That would
> be useful to the JSON community as it would avoid situations where some
> content works fine with XMLHttpRequest but not with other processors.
> ...

Interesting. Are you referring to 
<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/tip/Overview.html#json-response-entity-body>? 
Possibly step 1?

Details appreciated,

Julian
Received on Friday, 18 October 2013 12:20:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:22 UTC