- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:19:46 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "Appelquist Daniel (UK)" <Daniel.Appelquist@telefonica.com>
- CC: www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>
On 2013-10-18 14:07, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > ... > I do not see how a request from the W3C TAG as the one above will > improve anything for the JSON community. The TAG's resources would be > better spent trying to unify the many subtly different JSON variants. A > useful start would be working with W3C's Web Applications Working Group > so their XMLHttpRequest specification does not define a JSON variant of > its own, possibly through coordinating with the IETF JSON WG. That would > be useful to the JSON community as it would avoid situations where some > content works fine with XMLHttpRequest but not with other processors. > ... Interesting. Are you referring to <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/tip/Overview.html#json-response-entity-body>? Possibly step 1? Details appreciated, Julian
Received on Friday, 18 October 2013 12:20:23 UTC