Thanks for the invitation, but I think that you need one of our co-chairs there so that we have an authoritative voice to describe what the IETF WG is mandated to do. On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Appelquist Daniel (UK) < Daniel.Appelquist@telefonica.com> wrote: > Hi folks - > > On this topic, I will note that I took an action at last week's TAG f2f > (http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/836) to invite Tim Bray > and Doug Crockford to attend a future TAG call to discuss the situation - > which I had not yet put into action, but which which was intended to be a > bit of outreach and fact finding on this topic. > > So (adding Doug to the to: list) would you be able / interested to join a > discussion at one of our future TAG calls on this topic? If so, I suggest > we devote a whole call to this topic just to put it to bed. Our regular > calls are on Thursdays at 18:00 UK / 13:00 US Eastern / 10:00 US Pacific. > > East Side / West Side / Peace. > > Dan Appelquist > W3C TAG Co-Chair > > > > From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> > Date: Tuesday, 8 October 2013 16:31 > >Oh joy, dueling specs. That’s so 1999. > > > >On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> > wrote: > > > >IETF JSON members might want to review > > > >http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2013/10/02-minutes.html#item03 > > > >a report and discussion of (some members of) TC39 and the W3C TAG on the > >IETF activities around JSON. > >_______________________________________________ > >json mailing list > >json@ietf.org > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json > >
Received on Tuesday, 8 October 2013 20:11:01 UTC