Re: Web Architecture 101

On 17 June 2013 16:35, Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net> wrote:

> Hi,
> (cc: bruce lawson)
>
> I'm still thinking about the thread [1] "Some Feedback On Our Developer
> Meetup", the comments on different blog posts here [3] and there [4]. I
> have tried a few times to get the Web Architecture document [2] read by
> some of my colleagues or friends in the Web business. Many times it has
> been rejected as something abstract, sometimes they were put off by all the
> cruft at the beginning (status, etc.) Somehow parts of DesignIssues of Tim
> are more readable (not always).
>
> I wonder if a good start would be to have a simplified or at least
> beautified version of the Web architecture documentS. Something which is
> more accessible and quicker to read for different classes of Web
> professionals (yes I avoided the term Web developer). We could do it by
> cherry picking some topics. The main issue is as always having paid time to
> do it properly.
>

+1


>
>
> [1]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2013Jun/thread.html#msg14
> [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/
> [3]: http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2013/i-met-the-tag/
> [4]:
> http://jorabin.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/meet-developer-yes-but-what-for.html
>
> --
> Karl Dubost
> http://www.la-grange.net/karl/
>
>
>