I think this is all misdirection from the core question: Jeff: did you express that view to Anne? And is it not based on an *opinion* of the policies in effect with regards to derivitive works in this area? Is it really necessary to ask the AC to change the Team's opinion on this? Anne: can you make the formal request per the rule there? Jeff: assuming he does, can you please advise on a timeframe for getting a response? On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote: > On 7/12/2013 2:02 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> First, if Anne has a request, I would like to hear his request. I don't >>> want to hypothetically guess his request and respond to all possible >>> interpretations. >>> >> Alex asked why DOM in W3C was not updated. I told him that per your >> understanding of the W3C Member Agreement I could not be a Member of >> the W3C WebApps WG, push snapshots to TR/, while simultaneously edit >> http://dom.spec.whatwg.org/ This generalizes to other documents I work >> on as I understand it. >> >> I cannot speak for WHATWG (no space), but I personally would not want >> to edit anything that cannot be forked. >> > > As we've discussed many times, at a personal level I respect your decision > not to work on documents that cannot be forked, even though it disappoints > me from a W3C point of view. > > I've also said that over time I'm hopeful that we get to a point that we > have an evolved consensus in this area. > > First step - still not a done deal - is the revision of the HTML5 Charter > and forking for extension specifications. > > >> >> -- >> http://annevankesteren.nl/ >> > >
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 18:17:25 UTC