- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:40:21 +0000
- To: David Cuenca <dacuetu@gmail.com>
- CC: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
David, I believe there's something similar that's part of the Open Annotation community group's recent/work-in-progress specs: http://www.w3.org/community/openannotation/ http://www.openannotation.org/spec/extension/#Selector (This discussion suggests to me this might be something to be dealt with as a separate issue rather than as part of an existing spec?) (OA ppl: this relates to a discussion thread starting at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2013Feb/0107.html) #g -- On 20/02/2013 14:33, David Cuenca wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote: > >> >> Are you familiar with this: >> >> http://simonstl.com/articles/**cssFragID.html<http://simonstl.com/articles/cssFragID.html> >> >> Yes, I'm aware of the efforts of using CSS as fragids, however that > doesn't address the cross-media problem (using same citation structure for > paper based sources and for digital based sources). > > > >> ? I reckon that there's overlap in goals, and perhaps potential for >> collaboration. This is discussed as part of this group: >> >> http://www.w3.org/community/cssselfrags/ > > > Thanks for the tip! I will drop them a line. > > Regards, > David Cuenca >
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 11:10:22 UTC