- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:16:33 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-ID: <511A9511.5060400@openlinksw.com>
On 2/12/13 12:26 PM, Ashok Malhotra wrote: > > > On 2/12/2013 12:02 AM, Kyaw Tun wrote: >> Advanced query for: SELECT * FROM article WHERE license = 'SA' AND >> publisher = 'Nature' ORDER BY 'title' > > It's a good interface to Indexed DB but wouldn't it be easier to just > write the query directly? > That is, using q SQL interface on top of IDB? > > The argument against SQL is complexity but the complexity results from > functionality that > users want. > > Ashok Isn't that best handled by the WebDB API which is a natural fit for SQL RDBMS data sources? IndexedDB is aligned to Relational DBMS sources in a purer (and lower level) sense i.e., high level SQL != Relational DBMS, more of an implementation branch (extensional) of the subject matter realm RDBMS (which has intensional an extensional [1] [2] :-) Links: [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datalog . [2] https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/posts/LwEb8ccs8on -- coRelational concepts . -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 19:16:56 UTC