On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Konstantinov Sergey > <twirl@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > > In general, specifying push server <-> app server protocol is out of > scope of Push API spec. > > I don't see why it would be really. > We can imagine the API being standardized and the transport iterating underneath it. That's just good layering. For instance, if some system decides to deliver push notifications from the SMS baseband protocol, should we, as the web platform, decide that's a bad thing for them to be doing? I say "no", not because I don't want full specs, but because precluding opening this power to developers seems foolhardy at the level of an API contract. If we want to recommend that this WG open up a new effort to specify transport and message formats, great. But their API doesn't require it. We shouldn't either. Regards
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2013 19:57:30 UTC