W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Draft for note to send to Push API editors/authors

From: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:56:30 -0800
Message-ID: <CANr5HFVOVi9zv6wLeBJG7a+cuSHkpamivn3idS+1LMJKtsXRsQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: Konstantinov Sergey <twirl@yandex-team.ru>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Konstantinov Sergey
> <twirl@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
> > In general, specifying push server <-> app server protocol is out of
> scope of Push API spec.
>
> I don't see why it would be really.
>

We can imagine the API being standardized and the transport iterating
underneath it. That's just good layering.

For instance, if some system decides to deliver push notifications from the
SMS baseband protocol, should we, as the web platform, decide that's a bad
thing for them to be doing? I say "no", not because I don't want full
specs, but because precluding opening this power to developers seems
foolhardy at the level of an API contract.

If we want to recommend that this WG open up a new effort to specify
transport and message formats, great. But their API doesn't require it. We
shouldn't either.

Regards
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2013 19:57:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:57:00 UTC