W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2013

Re: [Json] Response to Statement from W3C TAG

From: Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:15:09 -0800
Cc: JSON WG <json@ietf.org>, www-tag@w3.org, "es-discuss@mozilla.org list" <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
Message-Id: <16D48B07-DE25-4E6F-9B39-30C41E28C4FA@wirfs-brock.com>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>

On Dec 10, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> ...
> If things had gone according to plan, it seems likely that Ecma would
> have requested the IANA registration for application/json jointly lists
> the IETF and Ecma International has holding Change Control over it, and
> it seems unlikely there would have been much disagreement about that.
> It is normal to award change control to other organisations, for
> instance, RFC 3023 gives change control for the XML media types to the
> W3C. I can look up examples for jointly held change control if that
> would help.

Speaking of media types.  I just noticed that RFC 4329 seems painfully out of date WRT application/ecmascript and application/javascript and the langauge specification that defines the payload.  

Perhaps this is another area that needs coordination.

Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2013 23:15:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:57:00 UTC