Re: Fwd: Working Group Last Call on the HTTPbis document set

Reminder: the Working Group Last Call ends in one week from now.

Best regards, Julian

On 2013-03-18 21:42, Jonathan A Rees wrote:
> (This relates to ACTION-682, on which more later. Jonathan)
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Mark Nottingham* <mnot@mnot.net <mailto:mnot@mnot.net>>
> Date: Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:51 PM
> Subject: Working Group Last Call on the HTTPbis document set
> To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org> Group"
> <ietf-http-wg@w3.org <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>>
>
> Since our last Working Group Last Calls on the RFC2616bis documents,
> there have been a number of substantial changes, brought about both by
> discussion and the editors' initiative (as discussed in Orlando).
>
> As such, we're having another (hopefully final) Working Group Last Call
> on the entire document set:
>
> * Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-22
>    Diffs from the previous WGLC:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-22.txt
>
> * Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-22
>    Diffs from the previous WGLC:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-22.txt
>
> * Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Conditional Requests
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-22
>    Diffs from the previous WGLC:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-22.txt
>
> * Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-22
>    Diffs from the previous WGLC:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-22.txt
>
> * Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-22
>    Diffs from the previous WGLC:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-22.txt
>
> * Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Authentication
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-22
>    Diffs from the previous WGLC:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-22.txt
>
> * Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Method Registrations
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-11
>    Diffs from the previous WGLC:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-11.txt
>
> * Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Authentication Scheme
> Registrations
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-06
>    Diffs from the previous WGLC:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-06.txt
>
> This WGLC will close on April 30, 2013.
>
>
> Providing Feedback
> ----------------
>
> Your input should be sent to this mailing list, clearly marked with
> "WGLC" and the appropriate part. E.g., with Subject lines such as:
>
> Subject: WGLC review of p1-messaging
> Subject: WGLC issue: "foo" in p2
>
> Issues that you believe to be editorial in nature (e.g., typos,
> suggested re-phrasing) can be grouped together in a single e-mail.
> Substantive issues (what we call "design" issues) that may need
> discussion should be sent one per e-mail, with a descriptive subject.
>
> If you disagree with the resolution of a previously discussed issue,
> you're encouraged to note that at this time.
>
> I'd especially encourage those who review the documents without finding
> significant issues to say so on the list; one of the challenges we have
> is to show that the documents have seen adequate review, and this
> becomes difficult when people are quiet.
>
> Also, please bring these documents to the attention of those HTTP
> implementers who may not have been following this process closely; they
> are likely to be the ones that go forward to IETF Last Call, then
> replacing RFC2616.
>
> Thanks for your efforts,
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2013 08:54:35 UTC