Re: new version of 'objectives matrix'

Link please?

On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 17:31 -0400, Jonathan A Rees wrote:
> re ACTION-726 and TAG effectiveness:
> As requested I added links to findings and issues. That means I've
> done everything I originally intended to do on this activity.
> I tried to include all findings and all open and pending review issues.
> There are a few exceptions for things I (subjectively) considered
> trivial or redundant.
> A few closed issues are in there too, but I found that for the most
> part these were either unimportant or redundant with findings.
> Some 'objectives' are similar to one another and the placement of
> findings and issues is sometimes somewhat arbitrary.
> The matrix is big. I split the 'approach' column into columns for
> architectural or tactical approach (technology independent) vs.
> 'realization' (how it plays out in practice). I also added a column
> for finding and issue references. There are a few new rows for
> architectural objectives not covered in AWWW (deep linking,
> mechanization, scalability), and a list of 'orphan' issues whose
> architectural objectives I was unable to articulate.
> Jonathan

David Booth, Ph.D.

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of his employer.

Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2012 22:18:09 UTC