- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:49:53 +0200
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- CC: www-tag@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On 14/09/2012 10:30 , Henry S. Thompson wrote: > See > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-suffix-regs-04 > > This registers +suffixes for several binary xml formats, and includes > text about fragment identifier interpretation precedence. Is anyone still creating new content using WBXML or Fast Infoset? (Or ASN.1 for that matter.) If not, I wonder if it wouldn't be more sensible to just flag those suffixes as historical and just move on. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Friday, 14 September 2012 08:50:03 UTC