- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 02:10:42 -0400
- To: "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
- CC: "Eric J. Bowman" <eric@bisonsystems.net>, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, W3C TAG <www-tag@w3.org>
On 10/6/2012 9:40 PM, Michael[tm] Smith wrote: > I don't think that's true. I think the correct architectural choice is to > tie the media type to the spec that attempts to be the most comprehensive > specification for the language. That's no different from the case of the > HTML4 spec. There was not a separate author spec for HTML4 -- there was > just one spec. Yes, but... the HTML5 specification also, for good reason, goes to great lengths to document interoperable client behavior for non-conforming content. I'm not particularly happy having that bit as part of the registration. The registration should describe conforming content only, I think. Noah
Received on Sunday, 7 October 2012 06:11:49 UTC