- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 16:58:51 -0400
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
I'm very glad to have these on the "possible" list, but notwithstanding the TBD slots, my best estimate is that the agenda is overfull. For example, Henry reminds me that the request on issue-57 was a half day plus one additional shorter slot, and I have not yet accomodated that. Obviously, we can prioritize as we go, including your list below. To the extent we can do things like including https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18975 in the existing scheme proliferation slot, all the better. We'll see how it goes. Noah On 10/6/2012 3:56 PM, Larry Masinter wrote: > * update on the "happy IANA" work (would probably fit into the "URI scheme proliferation"), > also report on registration of all schemes listed in Wikipedia by Dave Thaler > > * registerProtocolHanlder, registerContentHandler, the "web+" URI scheme prefix > This is related to the "URI Scheme Proliferation", but the recommended reading is different: > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18975 > HTML spec "Custom scheme and content handlers" > The bug report has some pointers worth following. > > * Forking the URL spec? > Is using "URI" and "IRI" 'drinking the kool-aide'? > Process and progress > > * precision vs. flexibility in standards, thread with Robin over the URL/IRI spec split. > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 6 October 2012 20:59:19 UTC