- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 19:09:13 +0000
- To: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
FYI, it's been proposed that Microdata be published as a NOTE rather than Rec track, since it's moving (or moved) to CR. Related to: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-comments/2011Jun/0038.html -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Microdata as W3C Note vs. W3C Rec. Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:57:48 +0000 Resent-From: public-html-comments@w3.org Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 10:57:20 -0800 From: Eric Franzon <eric@semanticweb.com> To: public-html-comments@w3.org Hello all, As an AC Rep (for SemanticWeb.com) and as someone who regularly interacts with developers just being introduced to Semantic Web concepts for the first time, I am writing to state my agreement with the position outlined by Manu Sporny in this post: http://manu.sporny.org/2012/microdata-cr/ Moving Microdata forward toward recommendation status adds confusion in an area already rife with confusion. I believe that Microdata should be published as a W3C Note. Best, --Eric -- *Eric Axel Franzon* Vice President of Community SemanticWeb.com 6080 Center Dr., 6th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90045 eric@semanticweb.com LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/ericfranzon Twitter: http://twitter.com/SemanticWeb
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2012 19:10:21 UTC