- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:45:11 +0000
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Jonathan A Rees <rees@mumble.net>, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, www-tag@w3.org, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Sandro Hawke writes:
> That sounds like a CG (and maybe eventually WG) activity, so it can
> focus on running code and a spec written by the people who need it and
> will implement it. There are details to work out (eg the issues
> mentioned in my blog post); is a TAG resolution really the place to do
> that?
If you follow the link JAR provided [1] and look in particular at the
F2F discussion [2], you will find the following resolution:
RESOLUTION: 1) Go back to community with perspective from background
section on what URIs can or can't be known to identify as the
response to change proposals 2) publish URIs in Data primer as a rec
3) publish a note base on proposal 27 with intention to transition
to RDF WG, all by April 1 2013
So I think the TAG agrees with you.
ht
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/defininguris-2012-10-30.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/10/08-minutes#item02
--
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 14:45:43 UTC