Re: W3C TAG to review draft on Best Practices for Fragment Identifiers and Media Type Definitions

I should clarify that [2] in the attached is an Editors' draft, not a 
working draft. It has not yet been reviewed by the TAG, and has no formal 
status except as input to discussions tomorrow. Please consider that in 
formulating any reviews; nonetheless, early input is welcome. Thank you.

Noah

On 6/11/2012 11:39 AM, Noah Mendelsohn wrote:
> The TAG is meeting F2F this week, and one of the items on our agenda for
> tomorrow [1] is a review of a draft discussing Best Practices for Fragment
> Identifiers and Media Type Definitions [2]. I know that members of the Core
> WG have expressed an interest in the past, particularly relating to generic
> processing of +xml forms. Please send comments to www-tag@w3.org. We will
> of course welcome comments after this week too, but any that arrive by
> tomorrow we will try to consider in our first round of discussions. (Sorry
> for the short notice -- I'm just reading the draft now, and made the
> connection). Thank you!
>
> Noah
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/06/12-agenda#fragid
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids-2012-05-28.html

Received on Monday, 11 June 2012 15:46:59 UTC