I should clarify that [2] in the attached is an Editors' draft, not a working draft. It has not yet been reviewed by the TAG, and has no formal status except as input to discussions tomorrow. Please consider that in formulating any reviews; nonetheless, early input is welcome. Thank you. Noah On 6/11/2012 11:39 AM, Noah Mendelsohn wrote: > The TAG is meeting F2F this week, and one of the items on our agenda for > tomorrow [1] is a review of a draft discussing Best Practices for Fragment > Identifiers and Media Type Definitions [2]. I know that members of the Core > WG have expressed an interest in the past, particularly relating to generic > processing of +xml forms. Please send comments to www-tag@w3.org. We will > of course welcome comments after this week too, but any that arrive by > tomorrow we will try to consider in our first round of discussions. (Sorry > for the short notice -- I'm just reading the draft now, and made the > connection). Thank you! > > Noah > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/06/12-agenda#fragid > [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids-2012-05-28.htmlReceived on Monday, 11 June 2012 15:46:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:45 UTC