On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> wrote: > To be more explicit (and provide additional URLs): > > http://www.w3.org/TR/fragid-best-practices/ is now (as of last week) a > W3C "First Public Working Draft" as the first step of the "Recommendation" > track at W3C. > The W3C TAG plan for moving this to Recommendation is > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/fragids.html > > (a) comments on the document itself should be sent to www-tag@w3.org. > Please note that the latest 'editor draft' is > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids. > > (b) it is likely too late to affect draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs > > (c) Perhaps a reference to it from > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-suffix-regs (as > an informative source of considerations an expert reviewer might take into > account) would be in order. > > Is there any objection from the WG to making a reference to this in the suffix-regs document? (Perhaps before we go there: Is that first w3.orgURI going to be a permanent URI to which we could make reference?) -MSK
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 11:37:32 UTC