W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2012

Re: [apps-discuss] "Best Practices for Fragment Identifiers and Media Type Definitions"

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 22:01:16 +0100
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <f5bfw89hskj.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
Murray S. Kucherawy writes:

> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> wrote:
>> To be more explicit (and provide additional URLs):
>>    http://www.w3.org/TR/fragid-best-practices/ is now (as of last week) a
>> W3C "First Public Working Draft" as the first step of the "Recommendation"
>> track at W3C.
>> . . .
> Is there any objection from the WG to making a reference to this in the
> suffix-regs document?

I can't speak officially for the rest of the TAG, but I am pretty sure
it is our hope that you will do precisely that.

> (Perhaps before we go there: Is that first w3.org URI going to be a
> permanent URI to which we could make reference?)

Yes, the URI above will be as permanent as any w3.org document URI.
It will track the latest version, and will eventually be the URI for
the approved W3C Recommendation, assuming we get that far.

       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Monday, 30 July 2012 21:01:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:46 UTC