- From: Bin Hu <bin.hu@huawei.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 05:14:00 +0000
- To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, "ashok.malhotra@oracle.com" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
I would agree with Noah that TAG is not in the position of drawing conclusion or giving guidance on legal facts. Rather, TAG should help the legal communities, and those involved in setting policy, understand the technical workings of the Web as well as try to clarify the technical community's use of terminology, in the hope of minimizing misunderstandings. Thanks Bin -----Original Message----- From: Noah Mendelsohn [mailto:nrm@arcanedomain.com] Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 7:52 PM To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com Cc: www-tag@w3.org Subject: Re: "Publishing and Linking": roles of intermediaries On 6/29/2012 9:06 PM, ashok malhotra wrote: > If chillingeffects.com can say it, why can't we? Chilling effects is an organization and Web site that has as its motto "Monitoring the legal climate for Internet activity". The TAG is the technical architecture steering committee for the World Wide Web consortium.. The TAG's charter says [1]: "The TAG's scope is limited to technical issues about Web architecture." I think we agreed awhile ago that, at least for now, our focus in the copyright and linking work would be to help the legal communities, and those involved in setting policy, to understand the technical workings of the Web, so that they would be better able to understand the likely impact of regulations or laws that they might promulgate. We also said we would try to clarify the technical community's use of terminology, in the hope of minimizing misunderstandings. I think those are both appropriate given the TAG's charter. Let's take one of your proposed quotes from Chilling Effects: "Question: Do I need permission to link to someone else's site? Answer: In general, if someone is making a website publicly available, others may freely link to it. That open linking is what makes the web a "web." " Personally, I would like things to be that way, but this is couched as a statement of legal fact. Whether it's accurate as a statement of the law in any particular jurisdiction, much less worldwide, is something about which I don't think the TAG has any business drawing conclusions. Noah [1] http://www.w3.org/2004/10/27-tag-charter.html#Scope
Received on Sunday, 1 July 2012 00:03:45 UTC