- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:18:36 +0000
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Hello Manu, On behalf of the TAG, thank you for adopting this change :) Jeni On 28 Jan 2012, at 17:33, Manu Sporny wrote: > bcc: www-tag > > Hi Jeni, > > Thank you for your public feedback on the RDFa 1.1 documents. This is an > official response from the RDF Web Apps WG to your issue before we enter > the 3rd Last Call for the RDFa 1.1 work this coming Tuesday. The Last > Call will last for 3 weeks, so there is still time for you to discuss > your concerns if we have not fully addressed them. > > Your issue was tracked here: > > https://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/84 > > Explanation of Issue > -------------------- > > The W3C TAG has been concerned about the discussion of fragment > identifiers in the RDFa Core 1.1 specification. We have tried to apply > changes, suggested by the TAG, to the document over the past year to > address these concerns. Most recently, you submitted new text to make > the issue of minting new IRIs using fragment identifiers a little more > clear. > > Working Group Decision > ---------------------- > > RESOLVED: Adopt the WWW TAG proposed language on fragment identifiers > and place it into RDFa Core 1.1 > > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2012-01-19#resolution_1 > > We have accepted your suggestion in full. > > Feedback > -------- > > Since this is an official Working Group response to your issue, we would > appreciate it if you responded to this e-mail and let us know if the > decision made by the group is acceptable to you as soon as possible. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: PaySwarm vs. OpenTransact Shootout > http://manu.sporny.org/2011/web-payments-comparison/ > > -- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Sunday, 29 January 2012 12:19:01 UTC