On 2012/01/20 19:27, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-01-20 11:23, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: >> I'm not sure what the difference would be between having e.g., >> "web+acme:hello" and "web:acme:hello", except for a multi-level >> structure where potential inventors of a new protocol/scheme get more >> confused than necessary. >> ... > > The difference is mainly process: "web+" needs coordination with and > approval by the IETF IRI WG, while "web:" is simply one additional new > URI scheme. I fully agree that for "web+", some process is needed. But if there's agreement on the technical need and solution (which we definitely don't have at this moment in time), then the process issue isn't really a big deal. Regards, Martin.Received on Friday, 20 January 2012 10:37:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:42 UTC