- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:23:37 +0900
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
On 2012/01/20 3:13, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-01-19 19:00, David Booth wrote: >> What other options are being considered? > Instead (stealing an idea mentioned earlier), it could simply define a > new URI scheme "web", and manage that namespace itself. At least that > would contain the effects of this experiment. I'm not sure what the difference would be between having e.g., "web+acme:hello" and "web:acme:hello", except for a multi-level structure where potential inventors of a new protocol/scheme get more confused than necessary. Regards, Martin.
Received on Friday, 20 January 2012 10:25:22 UTC