W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2012

Re: Schedule discussion of httpRange-14 for this week's telcon?

From: Jonathan A Rees <rees@mumble.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:12:18 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGnGFMKvRWMqj02_aDHMXXbLaFL1Mh3=iZjWhHF0X4NSRiX6QA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
Cc: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Contrary to appearances I am working hard on

  ACTION-691: Prepare table as described in 2012-04-04 minutes, for TAG review

which is due today. (Remember this is an evaluation of how well
various use cases fare under the various issue-57 proposals that are
on the table.) I have been working on the use case vs. proposal
matrix, and we could talk about it Thursday, but I think discussion
will be more efficient and profitable if we waited a week so that I'm
better prepared.

Those who would like to monitor my progress can consult


and other pages linked from http://www.w3.org/wiki/TagIssue57Home . I
plan to add two more use cases to the matrix, and review and document
all matrix entries.

The analysis has been extraordinarily difficult as the problem and
solution spaces are very high dimensional, and the proposals read as
if they are apples, oranges, mangoes, pine nuts, wing nuts, and
quantum foam.

We should also be prepared to talk about whether and how to hand this
work off to some other group, and I'd like some time to prepare for
that discussion.


On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com> wrote:
> Jonathan:
> I confess that the recent discussion of httpRange-14 has been quite hard for
> me to follow, which means I don't have a good intuition about when telcon
> discussion would be helpful, and when to leave things go in e-mail for
> awhile.
> FWIW: I sense that some of the TAG members who are not in the middle of the
> discussion would like to see a path toward focusing on some sort of end
> game, or at least significant progress that everyone can agree on. I know
> that's not easy, and perhaps not practical just now, but we really can't
> afford to have this keep spinning with its current intensity for 6 months or
> a year. So, please keep that in mind.
> Thank you!
> Noah
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 18:12:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:44 UTC