- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:10:06 -0400
- To: ned+ietf@mrochek.com, john+ietf@jck.com, tony+mtsuffix@maillennium.att.com
- CC: apps-discuss@ietf.org, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
The W3C Technical Architecture Group have been concerned about conflicting sources of definitions of fragment identifier semantics located by following RFC 3986 and the media type definition. We believe that those defining and registering media types (including ones that follow generic rules such as 3023bis) need more explicit advice than currently contained within draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs. In particular, we are working on defining best practice for use and definition of fragment identifier semantics, and the document http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids-2011-08-12 is under development (although it has not been formally reviewed or approved by the TAG). We believe media type registration authors should be pointed to these recommendations by reference from draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs. We would like to coordinate the development of these documents effectively and would appreciate your feedback on how best to accomplish this. Noah Mendelsohn For the W3C Technical Architecture Group
Received on Friday, 13 April 2012 01:10:36 UTC