W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2012

Re: Naming things with hashes (not #, but e.g. md5)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:33:59 +0200
Message-ID: <4F86E7D7.9020609@gmx.de>
To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
CC: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On 2012-04-12 16:24, Noah Mendelsohn wrote:
> On 4/11/2012 5:25 PM, Yves Lafon wrote:
>> I would say immutable rather than static, but yes, hashes can only
>> identify
>> immutable content,
> Is it helpful or confusing to point out that many Web applications use
> fragments to identify application states or content that are not
> static/immutable. See TAG's recent finding on Web Application State [1].
> I feel I'm missing some of the context for this bit of the debate, and
> why it is/isn't important that fragids do/don't identify immutable content.
> ...

I think you got confused by the term "hash", which here does not refer 
to the hash character starting the fragment identifier. See the subject 
line :-)
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2012 14:34:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:44 UTC