- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:33:59 +0200
- To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- CC: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On 2012-04-12 16:24, Noah Mendelsohn wrote: > > On 4/11/2012 5:25 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: >> >> I would say immutable rather than static, but yes, hashes can only >> identify >> immutable content, > > Is it helpful or confusing to point out that many Web applications use > fragments to identify application states or content that are not > static/immutable. See TAG's recent finding on Web Application State [1]. > I feel I'm missing some of the context for this bit of the debate, and > why it is/isn't important that fragids do/don't identify immutable content. > ... I think you got confused by the term "hash", which here does not refer to the hash character starting the fragment identifier. See the subject line :-)
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2012 14:34:36 UTC