W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2012

Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 15:45:00 -0400
Message-ID: <4F78B03C.3070405@openlinksw.com>
To: www-tag@w3.org
On 4/1/12 12:55 PM, David Booth wrote:
> This last requirement is necessary because we need to decide how to
> handle the case of the 10^11  web pages for which the URI owner has not
> explicitly said anything about how the page's URI should be
> interpreted.
What the URI says doesn't really matter. The moment a URI exists it 
identifies something. That's it. If the thing in question is a Web 
Resource, in the most basic scenario it is endowed with content that may 
or may note constitute representation for self, description of some 
other entity, or definition of some other entity. All we know is that 
URIs might resolve to content. We don't need anything else -- on a 
mandatory basis -- from the publisher of a URI.

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen








Received on Sunday, 1 April 2012 19:45:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:14 UTC