- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 19:28:48 +0200
- To: Jim Gettys <jg@freedesktop.org>
- CC: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
On 2011-09-26 19:04, Jim Gettys wrote: > On 09/26/2011 11:46 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: >> On 2011-09-26 15:25, Jim Gettys wrote: >>> ... >>> o lack of request #'s in responses, making out of order delivery >>> problematic. >>> ... >> >> Clarifying: server and intermediates are not supposed to re-order >> responses. >> >> So is this about being able to better work around this kind of breakage? >> > Not just the breakage: given what web sites have evolved into, I can see > what caused the breakage. Getting things back into order (given a > complex back end) is hard. > > And the server may have better information than the client what matters > to get first, conceivably. Me confused :-) Out-of-order delivery is not allowed by RFC 2616 -- we should be clear about things that would be nice-to-have for debugging, and things that maybe should have been defined differently... Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 26 September 2011 17:29:19 UTC