W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2011

RE: [happiana] Policy for registries for extensibility points

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:27:18 -0700
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, "duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D05D4AC0970@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
One area for TAG/IAB collaboration might be "extensibility" (including versioning, of course).

From: Bernard Aboba [mailto:bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 2:17 PM
To: duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp; Larry Masinter
Cc: happiana@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [happiana] Policy for registries for extensibility points

> > d) If there is a registry, it is only useful if values are registered. A registry which does not match actual use (as with URI schemes, Media Types) is harmful.

[BA] This seems like an important point which might be worth making within an IAB document on the subject of extensibility (draft-iab-extension-recs).   If people have suggested text (which might fit in Section 3.6), feel free to suggest it.
Received on Sunday, 16 October 2011 21:27:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:40 UTC