- From: John Kemp <john@jkemp.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 11:07:28 -0400
- To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Cc: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Hello Noah, all! On May 24, 2011, at 4:08 PM, Noah Mendelsohn wrote: > Larry and John, > > At the last TAG F2F, you jointly took: > > ACTION-515: on - Larry Masinter - (as trackbot proxy for John) who will publish http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/02/security-web.html, slightly cleaned up, with help from Noah and Larry - Due: 2011-04-12 - OPEN > > On the call this Thursday, we will be setting priorities for discussion at the upcoming F2F, so it would be helpful to know ASAP where we stand with this. > > Altogether, security seems like an area in which we'll have to do some serious thinking about what the TAG's goals are for the rest of the year, and who will do the work to help us achieve them. I did again send a note to Thomas Roessler to fulfill: > > ACTION-516: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Talk with Thomas Roessler about organizing W3C architecture work on security - Due: 2011-05-17 - > > but we don't have a response yet. > > Anyway, please let me know what's happening with the good work that John did. Thank you. Speaking personally, I actually did some more work in attempting to address comments on the document from the F2F, but because I didn't see any telco agenda item, or generally know what I should/can do given that I'm no longer on the TAG, my work has tailed off to the point where I await instruction from the group as to what the point of my work should be. I believe that any work on security should form part of an ongoing TAG activity. I am willing to aid that activity by continuing to write about security on the Web, but I'd need someone on the TAG to ensure that the TAG continues to have interest in that work. If no such interest is present, I will continue to occasionally publish Web security items on my blog from time to time. Regards, - John
Received on Friday, 27 May 2011 21:14:43 UTC